Is it pairs of pants or pair of pants?

Is it pairs of pants or pair of pants?

And here’s Garner’s: “The preferred plural of pair is pairs. In nonstandard usage, pair often appears as a plural.” So our advice is to use “pairs” in a situation like this: “Each package contains six pairs of socks.”

Why are pants called pants and not pant?

The word ‘pants’ comes to us from an Anglicization of the character’s name, “Pantaloon.” When trousers of a similar style became popular during the Restoration in England, they became known as pantaloons, Pantaloon being an Anglicization of Pantalone.

What are the pants with only one leg called?

For example, a predecessor to this trend is the asymmetrical jean, which includes one baggy leg and one skinny leg. During Paris Fashion Week in July, Celine Dion sported Ksenia Schnaider asymmetrical jeans, cementing the trend in fashion canon (as well as our hearts).

Why is a bra not called a pair?

Before the invention of the modern bra, women wore what was called a “bodice,” which the Oxford English Dictionary describes as “an inner garment for the upper part of the body, quilted and strengthened with whalebone.” That’s probably why the modern woman doesn’t put on “a pair of bras” in the morning.

Do you say a pair of pants?

So yes, you can leave out “a pair of” in the case of a generality. But as soon as you use a specific number, you must use “pairs of”. For example, you cannot say, “I need two pants”.

Where did pair of pants originated?

Central Asia
Trousers (British English), slacks, or pants are an item of clothing that might have originated in Central Asia, worn from the waist to the ankles, covering both legs separately (rather than with cloth extending across both legs as in robes, skirts, and dresses).

Was pants a bad word in England?

In England, in the 1880’s, ‘Pants’ was considered a dirty word. – Did You Know? In England, in the 1880’s, ‘Pants’ was considered a dirty word.

Is a pair of jeans one or two?

To talk about one piece of clothing we say “a pair of jeans”. For more than one we say “pairs of jeans”. You can also just say “jeans” for one pair. To call it “a jean” is incorrect.

Why is pants always plural?

From its inception in English, pants has been plural. It’s a shortened adaptation of pantaloons, those tight-like leg coverings worn by pirates and Shakespearean characters. And in those eras of 300 or 400 years ago, before pants were a single entity, pants were actually two separate garments.

Is a pair of trousers singular or plural?

You usually use a singular form of a verb with a pair of trousers. There was a pair of trousers in his carrier-bag. The form trouser is often used in front of another noun.

Why is a pair of scissors called a pair of scissors?

In Vulgar Latin, caesorium referred to a cutting instrument, and this Latin word was singular—even though the cutting instrument it named had two blades that slid past each other. We began calling an individual scissors a pair to emphasize the matched cutting blades.

Why are they called a pair of shorts?

They are called “shorts” because they are a shortened version of trousers, which cover the entire leg, but not the foot. Shorts are typically worn in warm weather or in an environment where comfort and air flow are more important than the protection of the legs.

Why are they called a pair of pants?

Why a Pair, though? Referring to pantaloons, and then pants or trousers, as a collective – aka “a pair of pants” – was due to the styles that were prevalent during the 17th and 18th-century forms of those garments, In those days, it was customary to have two separate leg pieces that one put on, then tied each around the waist.

When did they start referring to pants as pants?

The term “pants” was first used in 1840 by Edgar Allen Poe. Notice the plural. Some suggest that we have a pair of legs and pants (or underwear in a related context) cover them. But this is not likely the reason why they are referred to in the plural. Where Did Pants Come From?

Why do we call it a pair of underwear?

The reason why we refer to “a pair of underwear” followed the same logic as the pants or trousers, based on the way the garments evolved. Let’s follow the history. Many ancient cultures, including the Egyptians and Vedic Hindus, wore loincloths as underwear. The Romans, male and female, wore a version of shorts or loincloths called subligaculum.

Are there two legs in a pair of pants?

You see, before being made the way we know them today, pants were actually consisted of two separate legs that were secured at the waist. Here’s a picture of a chap pants: